<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 403 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202380</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 as the service tax was paid in advance. However, the penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 was confirmed due to the appellant not pressing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 403 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202380</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai set aside the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 as the service tax was paid in advance. However, the penalty of Rs. 1,000 under Section 77 was confirmed due to the appellant not pressing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>