<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 348 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202369</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in interpreting Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessment orders were not time-barred under Section 158BE. The court emphasized that the limitation period starts from the conclusion of the search as recorded in the last Panchnama, as per Explanation 2 to Section 158BE. Consequently, the court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and remitted the cases for further consideration on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 348 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202369</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) erred in interpreting Section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessment orders were not time-barred under Section 158BE. The court emphasized that the limitation period starts from the conclusion of the search as recorded in the last Panchnama, as per Explanation 2 to Section 158BE. Consequently, the court set aside the ITAT&#039;s decision and remitted the cases for further consideration on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202369</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>