<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 464 - ITAT, JABALPUR, LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202366</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to annul the Block Assessment Orders under section 158BD. It was found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction for initiating proceedings was not validly recorded, as it did not meet the legal requirements and was based on incorrect reasons. The Tribunal concluded that the block assessment proceedings were invalid due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing the necessity for objective and proper recording of satisfaction in such cases. The matter will be further deliberated by the regular Bench for a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 464 - ITAT, JABALPUR, LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202366</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to annul the Block Assessment Orders under section 158BD. It was found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction for initiating proceedings was not validly recorded, as it did not meet the legal requirements and was based on incorrect reasons. The Tribunal concluded that the block assessment proceedings were invalid due to procedural irregularities, emphasizing the necessity for objective and proper recording of satisfaction in such cases. The matter will be further deliberated by the regular Bench for a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>