<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 463 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202364</link>
    <description>In a service tax dispute concerning rent-a-cab services, the CESTAT, Ahmedabad considered whether the appellant was entitled to unconditional stay and complete waiver of pre-deposit. The tribunal did not grant full waiver and instead required the appellant to deposit part of the demanded amount within eight weeks. On compliance, recovery of the remaining demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 463 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202364</link>
      <description>In a service tax dispute concerning rent-a-cab services, the CESTAT, Ahmedabad considered whether the appellant was entitled to unconditional stay and complete waiver of pre-deposit. The tribunal did not grant full waiver and instead required the appellant to deposit part of the demanded amount within eight weeks. On compliance, recovery of the remaining demand was stayed during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>