<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 28 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202363</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s competency to pass orders under Section 35A (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and affirmed the refund of accumulated Cenvat credit to the respondents as per the modified orders issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 28 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202363</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s competency to pass orders under Section 35A (3) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and affirmed the refund of accumulated Cenvat credit to the respondents as per the modified orders issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the Commissioner&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>