https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202362 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite subsequent deposit of the amount after the deadline, the Tribunal rejected the application for restoration, emphasizing the loss of the right to appeal due to failure to meet the Supreme Court's specified deadline. The appellant's argument for restoration based on the belated deposit was dismissed, as the Tribunal could not extend the time limit set by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the appeals remained dismissed, as compliance within the specified period was crucial for appeal consideration. en-us Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202362 The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeals for non-compliance with deposit requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. Despite subsequent deposit of the amount after the deadline, the Tribunal rejected the application for restoration, emphasizing the loss of the right to appeal due to failure to meet the Supreme Court's specified deadline. The appellant's argument for restoration based on the belated deposit was dismissed, as the Tribunal could not extend the time limit set by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the appeals remained dismissed, as compliance within the specified period was crucial for appeal consideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202362