https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202361 The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 30,000 under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, considering the absence of clandestine removal and the delay in payment without invoking Section 11AC. The decision aimed to balance the enforcement of penalties with the circumstances of the case, aligning with precedents that justified penalty reduction in similar situations. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202361 The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant to Rs. 30,000 under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, considering the absence of clandestine removal and the delay in payment without invoking Section 11AC. The decision aimed to balance the enforcement of penalties with the circumstances of the case, aligning with precedents that justified penalty reduction in similar situations. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202361