<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 669 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202350</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within four weeks and stay the realization of the balance demand pending the disposal of the appeals. The appellant&#039;s argument that they do not provide real estate agent services was not accepted, and the Tribunal upheld the adjudication authority&#039;s decision to levy Service tax based on the services provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 669 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202350</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs within four weeks and stay the realization of the balance demand pending the disposal of the appeals. The appellant&#039;s argument that they do not provide real estate agent services was not accepted, and the Tribunal upheld the adjudication authority&#039;s decision to levy Service tax based on the services provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>