<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 667 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202320</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s services did not fall under &quot;Intellectual Property Services&quot; but considered the issues related to &quot;Club or Association Services&quot; and &quot;Business Exhibition Services&quot; arguable. With the appellant&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat credit and the amount already deposited, the Tribunal deemed the deposited amount sufficient for the appeal&#039;s disposal, allowing the waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining amounts and staying recovery pending appeal. The Tribunal also directed the linking of the Revenue&#039;s appeal for non-imposition of a penalty under Section 76 for final disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 667 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202320</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed the appellant&#039;s stay petition for the waiver of pre-deposit of service tax and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s services did not fall under &quot;Intellectual Property Services&quot; but considered the issues related to &quot;Club or Association Services&quot; and &quot;Business Exhibition Services&quot; arguable. With the appellant&#039;s eligibility for Cenvat credit and the amount already deposited, the Tribunal deemed the deposited amount sufficient for the appeal&#039;s disposal, allowing the waiver of pre-deposit for the remaining amounts and staying recovery pending appeal. The Tribunal also directed the linking of the Revenue&#039;s appeal for non-imposition of a penalty under Section 76 for final disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>