<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 403 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving illicit clearance of processed fabrics without payment of Central Excise duty. The decision was based on procedural flaws, lack of corroborative evidence, defective Panchnama proceedings, and weaknesses in the department&#039;s case. The confirmation of duty demand and penalties against the appellant were overturned due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to establish a strong case, highlighting discrepancies and deficiencies in the investigation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 403 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal in a case involving illicit clearance of processed fabrics without payment of Central Excise duty. The decision was based on procedural flaws, lack of corroborative evidence, defective Panchnama proceedings, and weaknesses in the department&#039;s case. The confirmation of duty demand and penalties against the appellant were overturned due to the Revenue&#039;s failure to establish a strong case, highlighting discrepancies and deficiencies in the investigation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>