<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 387 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the doctrine of merger did not apply to the tax liability issue settled at the Dy. Commissioner&#039;s level. Despite this, the penalties imposed by the Commissioner were set aside due to the reasonable cause for delayed payment and the non-leviability of service tax on mining of minerals before 1-6-2007. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalties were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 387 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the doctrine of merger did not apply to the tax liability issue settled at the Dy. Commissioner&#039;s level. Despite this, the penalties imposed by the Commissioner were set aside due to the reasonable cause for delayed payment and the non-leviability of service tax on mining of minerals before 1-6-2007. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the penalties were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>