<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202260</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalties imposed on the Custom House Agents, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking them to the alleged conspiracy of duty-free clearance and diversion of imported goods against the Advance Licence. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and knowledge in establishing liability under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellants due to the absence of proof implicating them in the wrongdoing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 398 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202260</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the penalties imposed on the Custom House Agents, emphasizing the lack of evidence linking them to the alleged conspiracy of duty-free clearance and diversion of imported goods against the Advance Licence. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of concrete evidence and knowledge in establishing liability under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellants due to the absence of proof implicating them in the wrongdoing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>