<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 377 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202259</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow depreciation for a charitable institution, emphasizing the distinction between income computation and application for charitable purposes. It ruled that granting depreciation did not result in a double benefit as argued by the Revenue, citing precedents to support its decision. The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not raise substantial questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 377 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202259</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow depreciation for a charitable institution, emphasizing the distinction between income computation and application for charitable purposes. It ruled that granting depreciation did not result in a double benefit as argued by the Revenue, citing precedents to support its decision. The Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the Revenue&#039;s contentions did not raise substantial questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>