<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 570 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202257</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2000-01. The key issue was the interpretation of the limitation period under section 263(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the revision order must be issued within two years from the end of the financial year in which the original assessment order was passed. Emphasizing the doctrine of merger, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the rectification order merged with the original assessment order. The court found no substantial question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the revision order was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 570 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202257</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 2000-01. The key issue was the interpretation of the limitation period under section 263(2) of the Income-tax Act. The court held that the revision order must be issued within two years from the end of the financial year in which the original assessment order was passed. Emphasizing the doctrine of merger, the court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument that the rectification order merged with the original assessment order. The court found no substantial question of law and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the revision order was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>