https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202252 The Court held that objections to maintainability and limitation could not be accepted against the petitioner due to a previous order granting liberty to challenge the original order. The dismissal of the appeal based on limitation was deemed procedural, directing a fresh consideration of the order-in-original. Legal propositions from previous judgments were referenced, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case. The Court set aside the order-in-original, directing a reconsideration on its merits, quashing orders by the Commissioner (Appeal) and the Tribunal. The petition was allowed, with no costs awarded, and a stay order for eight weeks was granted. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202252 The Court held that objections to maintainability and limitation could not be accepted against the petitioner due to a previous order granting liberty to challenge the original order. The dismissal of the appeal based on limitation was deemed procedural, directing a fresh consideration of the order-in-original. Legal propositions from previous judgments were referenced, emphasizing the specific circumstances of the case. The Court set aside the order-in-original, directing a reconsideration on its merits, quashing orders by the Commissioner (Appeal) and the Tribunal. The petition was allowed, with no costs awarded, and a stay order for eight weeks was granted. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202252