<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 375 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202249</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in an appeal regarding the confiscation of imported goods by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found the confiscation unsustainable due to the non-hazardous nature of the goods, leading to a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery regarding the penalty imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of scientific evidence in determining the nature of imported goods and its legal implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 375 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202249</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in an appeal regarding the confiscation of imported goods by the Commissioner. The Tribunal found the confiscation unsustainable due to the non-hazardous nature of the goods, leading to a waiver of pre-deposit and a stay of recovery regarding the penalty imposed. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of scientific evidence in determining the nature of imported goods and its legal implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>