<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 374 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202247</link>
    <description>The HC held that a charitable trust may deduct depreciation when determining the percentage of income applied to charitable objects under section 11; this deduction does not amount to an impermissible double benefit. The court found the trust was not claiming double deductions and distinguished contrary Supreme Court authority on its facts. Consequently the questions were decided against the Revenue and in favour of the trust, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 374 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202247</link>
      <description>The HC held that a charitable trust may deduct depreciation when determining the percentage of income applied to charitable objects under section 11; this deduction does not amount to an impermissible double benefit. The court found the trust was not claiming double deductions and distinguished contrary Supreme Court authority on its facts. Consequently the questions were decided against the Revenue and in favour of the trust, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>