<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 337 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202235</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and penalties but reduced the quantum of redemption fines and penalties, considering the prolonged seizure of goods since 2003. The appeals were disposed of with specific reductions in fines and penalties for both the appellant company and its director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 337 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202235</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods and penalties but reduced the quantum of redemption fines and penalties, considering the prolonged seizure of goods since 2003. The appeals were disposed of with specific reductions in fines and penalties for both the appellant company and its director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>