<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 629 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, directing the CIT(A) to decide the matter in accordance with its directions on the interest claim related to unpaid royalty. The appellant was given the opportunity to present supporting evidence, emphasizing the need for a speaking order from the CIT(A). The appeals were deemed not to involve a substantial question of law under Section 260A, leading to the conclusion of the legal proceedings without further points raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 629 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, directing the CIT(A) to decide the matter in accordance with its directions on the interest claim related to unpaid royalty. The appellant was given the opportunity to present supporting evidence, emphasizing the need for a speaking order from the CIT(A). The appeals were deemed not to involve a substantial question of law under Section 260A, leading to the conclusion of the legal proceedings without further points raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>