<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 264 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202187</link>
    <description>The appeal by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation against an order-in-original for service tax was initially delayed due to misdirection to the wrong authority. The delay was found not condonable by the appellate authority, leading to the rejection of the appeal as time-barred. However, the Tribunal recognized that the appeal was timely filed within the statutory period at the appellate Commissioner&#039;s end, ultimately allowing the appeal to proceed for consideration on its merits. The importance of timely filing and proper transmission of appeal papers to the correct appellate authority was emphasized in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 264 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202187</link>
      <description>The appeal by Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation against an order-in-original for service tax was initially delayed due to misdirection to the wrong authority. The delay was found not condonable by the appellate authority, leading to the rejection of the appeal as time-barred. However, the Tribunal recognized that the appeal was timely filed within the statutory period at the appellate Commissioner&#039;s end, ultimately allowing the appeal to proceed for consideration on its merits. The importance of timely filing and proper transmission of appeal papers to the correct appellate authority was emphasized in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>