<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the lack of sufficient cause for the delay. Despite arguments regarding the date of receipt of the official copy of the order, the Tribunal emphasized the need for due diligence and justifiable reasons for condonation of delay. The department&#039;s failure to properly verify the delay condonation application, including the absence of a verified affidavit, further weakened their case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscored the importance of exercising discretion judiciously in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 460 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, citing the lack of sufficient cause for the delay. Despite arguments regarding the date of receipt of the official copy of the order, the Tribunal emphasized the need for due diligence and justifiable reasons for condonation of delay. The department&#039;s failure to properly verify the delay condonation application, including the absence of a verified affidavit, further weakened their case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision underscored the importance of exercising discretion judiciously in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>