<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202178</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision for not complying with directions to ascertain facts and apply the law regarding the leviability of customs duty on an Indian-built ship sold for breaking. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in line with the Court&#039;s observations in C.A. No. 1998 of 2000, emphasizing the importance of accurately establishing facts before determining the duty applicability. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202178</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision for not complying with directions to ascertain facts and apply the law regarding the leviability of customs duty on an Indian-built ship sold for breaking. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for reconsideration in line with the Court&#039;s observations in C.A. No. 1998 of 2000, emphasizing the importance of accurately establishing facts before determining the duty applicability. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>