<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 365 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, waiving pre-deposit and proceeding to dispose of the appeal due to its limited scope. The dismissal of the Writ Petition against the Order-in-Appeal was significant, with the withdrawal of the Writ Petition influencing the proceedings. Issues arose regarding the acknowledgment of the 12th License&#039;s Export Obligation Discharge Certificates (EODCs), leading to appeals and correspondence. A letter deemed non-appealable was reinterpreted as an order, allowing an appeal and remanding the matter for reconsideration. Timely submission of EODCs was emphasized for finality of orders, with appeals allowed based on EODC submissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 365 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, waiving pre-deposit and proceeding to dispose of the appeal due to its limited scope. The dismissal of the Writ Petition against the Order-in-Appeal was significant, with the withdrawal of the Writ Petition influencing the proceedings. Issues arose regarding the acknowledgment of the 12th License&#039;s Export Obligation Discharge Certificates (EODCs), leading to appeals and correspondence. A letter deemed non-appealable was reinterpreted as an order, allowing an appeal and remanding the matter for reconsideration. Timely submission of EODCs was emphasized for finality of orders, with appeals allowed based on EODC submissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>