<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 543 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202174</link>
    <description>Transport subsidy received under a Government scheme is not profit derived from an industrial undertaking for deduction under Section 80-IA, because the phrase &quot;derived from&quot; requires a direct and immediate nexus with the eligible business operations. The subsidy is intended to reimburse transport-related costs and support viability in remote areas, but its source remains the scheme itself rather than manufacture or operational activity. As an incidental receipt, it falls outside the profit-linked incentive provision, so the deduction claim on that subsidy fails and the Revenue&#039;s position is upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 543 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202174</link>
      <description>Transport subsidy received under a Government scheme is not profit derived from an industrial undertaking for deduction under Section 80-IA, because the phrase &quot;derived from&quot; requires a direct and immediate nexus with the eligible business operations. The subsidy is intended to reimburse transport-related costs and support viability in remote areas, but its source remains the scheme itself rather than manufacture or operational activity. As an incidental receipt, it falls outside the profit-linked incentive provision, so the deduction claim on that subsidy fails and the Revenue&#039;s position is upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>