<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202171</link>
    <description>An appellate order that merely replicated the adjudicating authority&#039;s reasoning was treated as showing pre-judgment and a lack of independent consideration. The matter was therefore remanded so the appellate authority could decide the dispute afresh by passing a reasoned and speaking order addressing the controversy, the appellant&#039;s submissions, the evidence, and the basis for the decision. Pre-deposit was also dispensed with, reflecting the need to cure the defective appellate process before further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 364 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202171</link>
      <description>An appellate order that merely replicated the adjudicating authority&#039;s reasoning was treated as showing pre-judgment and a lack of independent consideration. The matter was therefore remanded so the appellate authority could decide the dispute afresh by passing a reasoned and speaking order addressing the controversy, the appellant&#039;s submissions, the evidence, and the basis for the decision. Pre-deposit was also dispensed with, reflecting the need to cure the defective appellate process before further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>