<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 628 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders regarding the refund of the sanctioned rebate and appropriation of the amount due to the Department. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision in line with the law, emphasizing the need to address issues on their merits and adhere to legal provisions. The lower authority&#039;s orders were made subject to the final outcome of the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 628 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders regarding the refund of the sanctioned rebate and appropriation of the amount due to the Department. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision in line with the law, emphasizing the need to address issues on their merits and adhere to legal provisions. The lower authority&#039;s orders were made subject to the final outcome of the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>