<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty payment due to the misuse of CENVAT credit by the assessee, in accordance with the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside, while the penalty under Rule 25 was reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- based on legal precedents. The appeal was partly allowed with modifications in the penalties imposed, as per the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 140 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty payment due to the misuse of CENVAT credit by the assessee, in accordance with the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The penalty under Section 11AC was set aside, while the penalty under Rule 25 was reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- based on legal precedents. The appeal was partly allowed with modifications in the penalties imposed, as per the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>