<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202140</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit is available only on a genuine showing of undue hardship, balanced against protection of revenue. Here, the Tribunal found that the appellants had not established financial distress, as their BIFR applications were either rejected or did not demonstrate genuine sickness, and the conduct noted in those proceedings cast doubt on the hardship claim. The earlier finding that no prima facie case had been made out on merits remained unchanged. The appellants were therefore required to deposit the entire duty demand, while pre-deposit of interest and penalty was waived on such deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202140</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit is available only on a genuine showing of undue hardship, balanced against protection of revenue. Here, the Tribunal found that the appellants had not established financial distress, as their BIFR applications were either rejected or did not demonstrate genuine sickness, and the conduct noted in those proceedings cast doubt on the hardship claim. The earlier finding that no prima facie case had been made out on merits remained unchanged. The appellants were therefore required to deposit the entire duty demand, while pre-deposit of interest and penalty was waived on such deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>