https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202127 In revision proceedings concerning a service tax rebate claim, the Tribunal held that breach of notification conditions would ordinarily justify denial of rebate, but the impugned order had not rejected admissibility and had instead directed recovery with credit to the Consumer Welfare Fund. On a prima facie view, it also treated the dispute as covered by the appellant's earlier case. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed dues pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202127 In revision proceedings concerning a service tax rebate claim, the Tribunal held that breach of notification conditions would ordinarily justify denial of rebate, but the impugned order had not rejected admissibility and had instead directed recovery with credit to the Consumer Welfare Fund. On a prima facie view, it also treated the dispute as covered by the appellant's earlier case. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found a case for waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the disputed dues pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202127