<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 561 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202124</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision to allow CENVAT Credit to the Assessee despite discrepancies in the Bills of Entry and importer registration status. The Court found that all necessary details were present, and Rule 9(2) provisions supported the allowance of credit. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 561 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202124</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision to allow CENVAT Credit to the Assessee despite discrepancies in the Bills of Entry and importer registration status. The Court found that all necessary details were present, and Rule 9(2) provisions supported the allowance of credit. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>