<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202097</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee on the exclusion of sales-tax and excise duty from total turnover for deduction u/s.80HHC, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. However, the ITAT remanded the issue of excluding 90% of miscellaneous receipts back to the AO for further examination. The ITAT upheld adjustments for excess prices compared to Arm&#039;s length prices in some transactions but deleted additions for items with minimal price differences. Regarding the re-computation of deduction u/s.80HHC(3)(a) after setting off business loss, the ITAT sided with the Revenue, emphasizing the need for positive profits before granting deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 42 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202097</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the Assessee on the exclusion of sales-tax and excise duty from total turnover for deduction u/s.80HHC, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision. However, the ITAT remanded the issue of excluding 90% of miscellaneous receipts back to the AO for further examination. The ITAT upheld adjustments for excess prices compared to Arm&#039;s length prices in some transactions but deleted additions for items with minimal price differences. Regarding the re-computation of deduction u/s.80HHC(3)(a) after setting off business loss, the ITAT sided with the Revenue, emphasizing the need for positive profits before granting deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>