<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202092</link>
    <description>Medical exigency affecting a Managing Director was accepted as sufficient cause for delay in filing an appeal, because prolonged treatment prevented timely attendance to the filing process. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection that the appellant should have organised its business affairs to ensure filing within time, and condoned the delay. It also directed the registry to place the stay application and appeal on record for disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 377 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202092</link>
      <description>Medical exigency affecting a Managing Director was accepted as sufficient cause for delay in filing an appeal, because prolonged treatment prevented timely attendance to the filing process. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s objection that the appellant should have organised its business affairs to ensure filing within time, and condoned the delay. It also directed the registry to place the stay application and appeal on record for disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>