https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202091 Stay of recovery of Service Tax was refused as premature because the appellants' liability under the impugned order had not yet been quantified by the Original Authority. The Tribunal noted that the order restructured liability to cover the period of one year prior to 8-4-2009, but no communication determining the exact amount had been issued. In these circumstances, interim protection against recovery could not be granted before the liability was communicated. The appellants were given liberty to file a fresh application once the quantified liability was made known to them. en-us Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202091 Stay of recovery of Service Tax was refused as premature because the appellants' liability under the impugned order had not yet been quantified by the Original Authority. The Tribunal noted that the order restructured liability to cover the period of one year prior to 8-4-2009, but no communication determining the exact amount had been issued. In these circumstances, interim protection against recovery could not be granted before the liability was communicated. The appellants were given liberty to file a fresh application once the quantified liability was made known to them. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 05 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202091