https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202089 The Department's application for stay was dismissed as the impugned order was non-executable. An early hearing was granted for the appeal scheduled on 28th July 2010 due to the significant revenue involved. The stay order granted on 13th April 2010 was vacated as it was found to be based on incomplete consideration of merits, and the dropping of show cause notices did not justify a stay. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund claim issue would be addressed separately in related proceedings. en-us Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202089 The Department's application for stay was dismissed as the impugned order was non-executable. An early hearing was granted for the appeal scheduled on 28th July 2010 due to the significant revenue involved. The stay order granted on 13th April 2010 was vacated as it was found to be based on incomplete consideration of merits, and the dropping of show cause notices did not justify a stay. The Tribunal emphasized that the refund claim issue would be addressed separately in related proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202089