https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202071 The court dismissed the petition seeking writ of certiorari to quash impugned orders due to the petitioner's significant delays in challenging the orders, including repeated applications after extended intervals. Despite claims of delayed service affecting the appeal timeline, the court found the petitioner's conduct disentitled them from relief under Article 226. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal actions and adherence to procedural requirements, the court rejected the petition, citing lack of merit, inordinate delays, and failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for prolonged legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202071 The court dismissed the petition seeking writ of certiorari to quash impugned orders due to the petitioner's significant delays in challenging the orders, including repeated applications after extended intervals. Despite claims of delayed service affecting the appeal timeline, the court found the petitioner's conduct disentitled them from relief under Article 226. Emphasizing the importance of timely legal actions and adherence to procedural requirements, the court rejected the petition, citing lack of merit, inordinate delays, and failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for prolonged legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202071