<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202060</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order in a tax appeal case, directing a fresh assessment in accordance with legal observations from a prior judgment. The Court emphasized that penalties under Sections 76 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be reduced below the prescribed minimum limit. The matter was remanded for reevaluation based on the Court&#039;s previous decision, ultimately disposing of the tax appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202060</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order in a tax appeal case, directing a fresh assessment in accordance with legal observations from a prior judgment. The Court emphasized that penalties under Sections 76 and 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be reduced below the prescribed minimum limit. The matter was remanded for reevaluation based on the Court&#039;s previous decision, ultimately disposing of the tax appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>