https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202058 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not classified as a job worker under Rule 10A and that the relationship with SIPL was on a principal-to-principal basis. The Tribunal found that the appellant's independent procurement of raw materials and the commercial terms of the agreement supported this position. Citing precedent, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and granting consequential relief. The judgment was pronounced on 8-9-2010. en-us Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202058 The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was not classified as a job worker under Rule 10A and that the relationship with SIPL was on a principal-to-principal basis. The Tribunal found that the appellant's independent procurement of raw materials and the commercial terms of the agreement supported this position. Citing precedent, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and granting consequential relief. The judgment was pronounced on 8-9-2010. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202058