<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 447 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202055</link>
    <description>Penalty on inadmissible Cenvat credit may not survive where the assessee reverses the credit on detection, as the penal consequence under Rule 13 is not justified on those facts. Interest remains payable where the inadmissible credit was actually taken and utilised for a period, because utilisation triggers the interest liability notwithstanding later reversal. The assessee therefore obtained relief on penalty, but not on interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 447 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202055</link>
      <description>Penalty on inadmissible Cenvat credit may not survive where the assessee reverses the credit on detection, as the penal consequence under Rule 13 is not justified on those facts. Interest remains payable where the inadmissible credit was actually taken and utilised for a period, because utilisation triggers the interest liability notwithstanding later reversal. The assessee therefore obtained relief on penalty, but not on interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>