<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 741 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202044</link>
    <description>A prima facie classification dispute over whether the activity was body building of vehicles using materials supplied by the contractee, rather than business auxiliary service, justified interim relief. The tribunal found the classification question arguable at the stage of pre-deposit and granted waiver of pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal, without expressing any view on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 741 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202044</link>
      <description>A prima facie classification dispute over whether the activity was body building of vehicles using materials supplied by the contractee, rather than business auxiliary service, justified interim relief. The tribunal found the classification question arguable at the stage of pre-deposit and granted waiver of pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal, without expressing any view on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>