<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 346 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order extending the seizure of the exporter&#039;s bank account, stating the extension lacked justification without clear evidence that the funds were proceeds of smuggled goods. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, permitting ongoing investigation and issuance of a show-cause notice in compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced on 30-7-2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 346 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order extending the seizure of the exporter&#039;s bank account, stating the extension lacked justification without clear evidence that the funds were proceeds of smuggled goods. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, permitting ongoing investigation and issuance of a show-cause notice in compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced on 30-7-2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>