https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202033 A petition challenging the refusal to entertain a discharge application under Section 245(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was found not maintainable. The accused also relied on the fact that charges had been framed and examination under Section 313 had already taken place, but the Court held that the materials disclosed a case requiring trial. As the prosecution was fit to proceed, no interference with the trial court's course of action was warranted, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jan 2011 13:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202033 A petition challenging the refusal to entertain a discharge application under Section 245(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was found not maintainable. The accused also relied on the fact that charges had been framed and examination under Section 313 had already taken place, but the Court held that the materials disclosed a case requiring trial. As the prosecution was fit to proceed, no interference with the trial court's course of action was warranted, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202033