https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202027 The court rejected the application to permit respondents to come on record for joint family property rights due to lack of diligence and property sale in 1993. The Miscellaneous Writ was dismissed, barring factual disputes, but granting liberty for rights establishment in legal proceedings. Writ petitions contesting property sale were rejected based on market value comparisons and absence of natural justice violations. The judgment upheld property valuation, emphasizing RBI approval and tax compliance, affirming the legality of the property sale to the Central Government. Previous Supreme Court rulings supported the dismissal of grievances, with no interference warranted. en-us Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Dec 2012 18:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202027 The court rejected the application to permit respondents to come on record for joint family property rights due to lack of diligence and property sale in 1993. The Miscellaneous Writ was dismissed, barring factual disputes, but granting liberty for rights establishment in legal proceedings. Writ petitions contesting property sale were rejected based on market value comparisons and absence of natural justice violations. The judgment upheld property valuation, emphasizing RBI approval and tax compliance, affirming the legality of the property sale to the Central Government. Previous Supreme Court rulings supported the dismissal of grievances, with no interference warranted. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202027