<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202020</link>
    <description>A duty-linked penalty under Section 11AC can be sustained only when the statutory preconditions and the relevant post-28-9-1996 duty liability are clearly established; on the facts stated, the basis for invoking the provision was not made out, so the Revenue&#039;s penalty challenge failed. A belated MODVAT credit claim was not entertainable where excisable clearances were made beyond the SSI exemption limit without registration and without compliance with mandatory Central Excise procedure; the credit claim was rejected. The stated outcome is that both the Revenue&#039;s appeal on penalty and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection for MODVAT credit were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 370 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202020</link>
      <description>A duty-linked penalty under Section 11AC can be sustained only when the statutory preconditions and the relevant post-28-9-1996 duty liability are clearly established; on the facts stated, the basis for invoking the provision was not made out, so the Revenue&#039;s penalty challenge failed. A belated MODVAT credit claim was not entertainable where excisable clearances were made beyond the SSI exemption limit without registration and without compliance with mandatory Central Excise procedure; the credit claim was rejected. The stated outcome is that both the Revenue&#039;s appeal on penalty and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection for MODVAT credit were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>