<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 820 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202008</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request to waive the balance demand of Rs. 1.12 crores during the appeal process, citing the appellant&#039;s cooperation in reducing the disputed amount. This decision was influenced by the principles established in the case of Ravi Gupta v. CST, Delhi, ensuring that undue hardship was avoided for the appellant during the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 820 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202008</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request to waive the balance demand of Rs. 1.12 crores during the appeal process, citing the appellant&#039;s cooperation in reducing the disputed amount. This decision was influenced by the principles established in the case of Ravi Gupta v. CST, Delhi, ensuring that undue hardship was avoided for the appellant during the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>