https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202007 The CESTAT recalled an ex parte pre-deposit order after considering the explanation for non-appearance, the smallness of the demand, and the need to avoid rejecting the appeal at the threshold without hearing on merits. Exercising its power under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1962, it restored the matter to its original position and granted the appellant an opportunity of hearing in the stay application and appeal on the fixed date. The order was expressly confined to the facts of the case and stated not to operate as a precedent. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202007 The CESTAT recalled an ex parte pre-deposit order after considering the explanation for non-appearance, the smallness of the demand, and the need to avoid rejecting the appeal at the threshold without hearing on merits. Exercising its power under Rule 41 of the CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1962, it restored the matter to its original position and granted the appellant an opportunity of hearing in the stay application and appeal on the fixed date. The order was expressly confined to the facts of the case and stated not to operate as a precedent. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202007