<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202004</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit and penalty imposed on manufacturers of textile machinery parts. The Tribunal emphasized that the collection of an amount from job workers for losses due to defective inputs does not justify credit reversal. Therefore, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessees, as the penalty was linked to the now-invalidated recovery demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 344 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202004</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit and penalty imposed on manufacturers of textile machinery parts. The Tribunal emphasized that the collection of an amount from job workers for losses due to defective inputs does not justify credit reversal. Therefore, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessees, as the penalty was linked to the now-invalidated recovery demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>