<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 582 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202002</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, dismissing the appeal against the order denying a higher reward to the Appellant for assisting in detecting excise duty evasion. The Court held that the reward given was in accordance with guidelines, and there was no legal basis to mandate a higher amount. The Appellant was advised to pursue civil court proceedings if seeking a greater reward based on the recovered excise duty amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 582 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202002</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the decision of the Single Judge, dismissing the appeal against the order denying a higher reward to the Appellant for assisting in detecting excise duty evasion. The Court held that the reward given was in accordance with guidelines, and there was no legal basis to mandate a higher amount. The Appellant was advised to pursue civil court proceedings if seeking a greater reward based on the recovered excise duty amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>