<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 306 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201983</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding the appellant&#039;s involvement in a conspiracy to obtain DEPB licenses using forged documents. The Court held that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination did not violate principles of natural justice due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and failure to engage during the investigation and proceedings. The Court emphasized the detailed and unretracted statements of co-noticees implicating the appellant in the conspiracy, ultimately concluding that the appeal lacked merit based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 306 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201983</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the penalty imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, finding the appellant&#039;s involvement in a conspiracy to obtain DEPB licenses using forged documents. The Court held that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination did not violate principles of natural justice due to the appellant&#039;s lack of cooperation and failure to engage during the investigation and proceedings. The Court emphasized the detailed and unretracted statements of co-noticees implicating the appellant in the conspiracy, ultimately concluding that the appeal lacked merit based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>