<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 816 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s stay application regarding an impugned order concerning the credit of input stage in exported services. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had granted benefits to the respondent for services used in rendering the exported services, and Rule 5 might apply in this case. The decision in a previous case was considered applicable, leading to the dismissal of the stay application as there was no valid reason to do so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 816 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s stay application regarding an impugned order concerning the credit of input stage in exported services. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner (Appeals) had granted benefits to the respondent for services used in rendering the exported services, and Rule 5 might apply in this case. The decision in a previous case was considered applicable, leading to the dismissal of the stay application as there was no valid reason to do so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>