<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for a detailed examination of relevant dates for filing refund claims, clarified the distinction between final assessment and duty adjustment dates, rejected the claim for extended time limit based on government status, and called for a reassessment of the unjust enrichment aspect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 369 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for a detailed examination of relevant dates for filing refund claims, clarified the distinction between final assessment and duty adjustment dates, rejected the claim for extended time limit based on government status, and called for a reassessment of the unjust enrichment aspect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=201955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>